This is our third review roundup. It includes the books that have been previously reviewed, and starts at the bottom with the earliest reviews.
I was going to add a Survivalist tag, to distinguish the hard core us-against-the-collapsing-world novels, from the more generally dystopian fare, but it is actually a hard criterion to peg down. You either have too few books to make it worth the effort, or too many. Everyone knows that Rawles’ Survivor series would fit the bill, but what about tales of urban survival, or bureaucratic survival, where people are surviving on their pluck and wits? What about Susan Pfeffer’s stories where the family just lays low and stays out of the way?
Review Roundup | Author | Review Link | Type | Disaster | Real | Read |
AP | PO | 5 | 7 | |||
Joe Nobody | AP | EC, NP | 7 | 6 | ||
AP | N, NP, EC | 4 | 5 | |||
Vivi Andrew | PA, R | D | 5 | 7 | ||
C | PO, GW | 7 | 5 | |||
AP | W, EC | 1 | 2 | |||
Andrez Bergen | PO | EC, GW | 2 | 2 | ||
Jim Crace | C | D, GW | 3 | 5 | ||
David Crawford | AP | E | 7 | 4 | ||
C | D | 2 | 5 | |||
AP | NP | 5 | 4 | |||
AP | NN, NP | 3 | 2 | |||
AP | N | 5 | 6 | |||
AP | NN, NP | 3 | 3 | |||
AP | EC | 4 | 4 | |||
N. Stephenson | NoA | - | 5 | 5 | ||
Sigrid Nunez | AP, L | D | 3 | 4 | ||
Robert Edric | AP, L | GW,EC | 6 | 3 | ||
John Grit | AP | D | 7 | 7 | ||
Cape, Buckner | AP | PO, EC | 6 | 6 | ||
PA | PO, NP | 7 | 7 | |||
Ervin Sim | PO, SF | G | 3 | 3 | ||
Guy Salvidge | AP | GW, EC | 6 | 6 | ||
I Sniper | Stephen Hunter | NoA | - | 6 | 7 | |
Will McIntosh | AP, SF | B, PO, EC, GW | 5 | 6 | ||
Kurt Cobb | NoA | - | 5 | 5 | ||
Ardath Mayhar | AP | N | 5 | 5 | ||
C, SF, YA | PO, GW, B | 4 | 6 | |||
Honey Brown | AP | D | 7 | 7 | ||
AP, L | EC, D | 6 | 7 | |||
C, SF | PO, GW, B | 4 | 7 | |||
C, SF | GW, PO, NP | 4 | 6 | |||
PA | GW | 5 | 6 | |||
Crmc McCarthy | PA | PD | 6 | 6 | ||
Nathan Poell | AP, PA | W | 5 | 5 | ||
Stphn Pressfield | NoA | - | 7 | 6 | ||
Chris Sullins | AP, M | EC, NP | 7 | 4 | ||
Jean Hegland | AP, L | EC | 7 | 5 | ||
AP | PO, GW | 5 | 4 | |||
Jack Womack | AP, L | EC | 5 | 4 | ||
AP | GW | 5 | 5 | |||
Richard Michaels | AP | N | 7 | 2 | ||
Alex Scarrow | AP | PO, NP | 7 | 7 | ||
Terry DeHart | AP | N,E | 6 | 4 | ||
Carla Buckley | AP | D | 7 | 6 | ||
Louis L’Amour | NoA | - | 6 | 5 | ||
Neil Strauss | NoA | - | - | 6 | ||
AP, M | EC | 7 | 4 | |||
AP, YA | M, V | 6 | 5 | |||
AP, YA | M, V | 7 | 6 | |||
AP, YA | M, V | 7 | 6 | |||
AP | N | 7 | 5 | |||
Philip Revene | C | EC | 5 | 5 | ||
PA, SF | W | 4 | 3 | |||
AP | PD | 5 | 5 | |||
| | | | | | |
Reviewed Earlier | | | | | | |
Thomas Park | AP | EC, NP | 5 | 4 | ||
AP | GW | 5 | 5 | |||
Michael S. Turnlund | AP | EC, NP | 5 | 3 | ||
Nova | AP | EC | 6 | 5 | ||
PA | GW | 3 | 4 | |||
AP | D | 7 | 6 | |||
B.T. Post | AP | EC, GW, NP | 6 | 5 | ||
Michelle Widgen | AP, L | PO, GW | 7 | 7 | ||
| | | | | | |
Partial Reviews | | | | | | |
Doris Lessing | AP, L | EC | 5 | 4 | ||
Wm R. Forstchen. | AP | E | 6 | 4 |
The explanations are at the bottom, but let me reinforce that that Realism (Real)and Readability(Real) are not intended to be qualitative, they are meant as descriptive. The Scale is 1 to 7 with 7 being high, and thus 4 is the mid-point.
If you look at the Retrieved From the Future (at the top), its 5 in realism/grittiness means that it is more realistic than typical. The problems within the book are those that real people might face. If people actually worry about supplies, and keep track of their provisions, that would tend to be a pretty gritty book. The type of collapse scenario is not generally factored in unless it is an ongoing issue (such as with Walker Percy’s Love In the Ruins).
Retrieved From the Future has a seven readability. This means that it is a fairly straightforward, painless book to read. It is in no way a comment on its relative literary merits. In fact the “Literary (L) “ notation was added under “Type” because literary works are often a bit tough to read for the inexperience and I wanted to signal that type of difficulty, from that of a long, dull read. You will note, that of the recently reviewed works both Love In the Ruins, and Tobacco Stained Mountain Goar, both difficult reads, were given “L” notations.
If you want to know which books I liked, you will have to go to the review link. Usually the paragraph where I note my enjoyment level is about three from the bottom - particularly as I became more standardized in review format with the later
Type: | AP = Apocalypse in Progress | ||||||||
PO = Post Apocalypse | |||||||||
C = Collapsed- The agency of collapse is mostly past | |||||||||
M= Militia Element | |||||||||
SF= Elements advanced enough to be unfamiliar to us today | |||||||||
L= Literary (think low on action, lots of talking) | |||||||||
YA= Young Adult NoA= Not Apocalyptic R = Romance | |||||||||
Disaster | N= Nuclear | ||||||||
E= EMP (Electro Magnetic Pulse) | |||||||||
D= Pandemic Disease | |||||||||
PD= Plant Disease | |||||||||
B= Biotechnology | |||||||||
PO= Peak Oil | |||||||||
NP= Nefarious plotters trying to bring the world down | |||||||||
EC= Economic Collapse (other than peak oil) | |||||||||
NN= Nanotechnology | |||||||||
V= Volcano | |||||||||
M= Meteor or Comet strike | |||||||||
GW= Global Warming | |||||||||
W= Weird Science G= God or supernatural forces | |||||||||
Real | Realistic in tone - is it trying to portray an expected future. | ||||||||
7 = yes this will happen 4= barely possible1 = strong elements of fantasy | |||||||||
In most cases, where the effect is not ongoing, I am not factoring in unlikely disaster types. | |||||||||
Read | Readability = is it a fun or at least easy book to read. | ||||||||
7 = classic4= somewhat enjoyable 1= challenging; literary works often tend toward the challenging. | |||||||||
Note that you will enjoy a "4" if it is your type of book, but probably hate it if not. | |||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment