A review of the reviews. Note there is an updated version of this review with later reviewed books added and one or two slightly clarified definitional changes that can be found here.
......................................................................
......................................................................
Here are all of the books I have reviewed. The first section was in our recent round up, the next section is scattered throughout, and the last two are posted as partial reviews very early on. Linked are the novel (usually at amazon), its author (sometimes), and a link to my review. The first reading is realism, the second is readability.
I did not have enough room to go back over the cozy question again. The post originated with an excell file, so I may go over a deeper categorization later.
Realism had to exclude the cause of disaster, because some books that are very real and very gritty had fairly unlikely or nearly impossible disasters. Only when the very nature of the disaster caused unique problems within the book did I deduct for that. Speculative science fiction tends to be more interested in ideas than realism, so they are often relatively unrealistic. Beyond that, many of these books had a sense of whimsy or adventure, that may make for a good story, but tend make the reality of the situation fuzzy. For instance, Nova's Gardener Summer combined very well thought out economic collapse with an odd cowboy western mystique. If the novel has many little interesting vignettes as the hero wanders through a strangely altered landscape, you may have something of an interesting hero quest, but you don't have realty.
Note that the readability issue should not be taken to much to heart. Some types of books are easier to bring an excitement and energy level to than others. Flue pandemics make for a pretty fast paced immediacy. Slow collapse novels, or novels that go deeply into character preparations tend to be a little more difficult to keep moving. Be forewarned, a "7" that is also listed as 'L" (Literary) under type is relative to that type. There will not be a ton of action, and it likely will be very brooding.
I did the numbering quickly to avoid too much circular cross-comparison. It is very possible I may have made a mistake somewhere.
Review Roundup | Author | My Review | Type | Disaster | Real | Read |
Ardath Mayhar | AP | N | 5 | 5 | ||
C, SF, YA | PO, GW, B | 4 | 6 | |||
Honey Brown | AP | D | 7 | 7 | ||
AP, L | EC, D | 6 | 7 | |||
C, SF | PO, GW, B | 4 | 7 | |||
C, SF | GW, PO, NP | 4 | 6 | |||
PA | GW | 5 | 6 | |||
Cormac McCarthy | PA | PD | 6 | 6 | ||
Nathan Poell | AP, PA | W | 5 | 5 | ||
Stephen Pressfield | - | - | 7 | 6 | ||
Chris Sullins | AP, M | EC, NP | 7 | 4 | ||
Jean Hegland | AP, L | EC | 7 | 5 | ||
AP | PO, GW | 5 | 4 | |||
Jack Womack | AP, L | EC | 5 | 4 | ||
AP | GW | 5 | 5 | |||
Richard Michaels | AP | N | 7 | 2 | ||
Alex Scarrow | AP | PO, NP | 7 | 7 | ||
Terry DeHart | AP | N,E | 6 | 4 | ||
Carla Buckley | AP | D | 7 | 6 | ||
Louis L’Amour | - | - | 6 | 5 | ||
Neil Strauss | - | - | - | 6 | ||
AP, M | EC | 7 | 4 | |||
AP, YA | M, V | 6 | 5 | |||
AP, YA | M, V | 7 | 6 | |||
AP, YA | M, V | 7 | 6 | |||
AP | N | 7 | 5 | |||
Philip Revene | C | EC | 5 | 5 | ||
PA, SF | W | 4 | 3 | |||
AP | PD | 5 | 5 | |||
Reviewed Earlier | ||||||
Thomas Park | AP | EC, NP | 5 | 4 | ||
AP | GW | 5 | 5 | |||
Michael S. Turnlund | AP | EC, NP | 5 | 3 | ||
Nova | AP | EC | 6 | 5 | ||
PA | GW | 3 | 4 | |||
AP | D | 7 | 6 | |||
B.T. (Brooks) Post | AP | EC, GW, NP | 6 | 5 | ||
Michelle Widgen | AP, L | PO, GW | 7 | 7 | ||
Partial Reviews | ||||||
Doris Lessing | AP, L | EC | 5 | 4 | ||
William R. Forstchen. | AP | E | 6 | 4 |
Type: | AP = Apocalypse in Progress | |||||||
PO = Post Apocalypse | ||||||||
C = Collapsed- The agency of collapse is mostly past | ||||||||
M= Militia Element | ||||||||
SF= Elements advanced enough to be unfamiliar to us today | ||||||||
L= Literary (think low on action, lots of talking) | ||||||||
YA= Young Adult | ||||||||
Disaster | N= Nuclear | |||||||
E= EMP (Electro Magnetic Pulse) | ||||||||
D= Pandemic Disease | ||||||||
PD= Plant Disease | ||||||||
B= Biotechnology | ||||||||
PO= Peak Oil | ||||||||
NP= Nefarious plotters trying to bring the world down | ||||||||
EC= Economic Collapse (other than peak oil) | ||||||||
NN= Nanotechnology | ||||||||
V= Volcano | ||||||||
M= Meteor or Comet strike | ||||||||
GW= Global Warming | ||||||||
W= Weird Science | ||||||||
Real | Realistic in tone - is it trying to portray an expected future. | |||||||
7 = yes this will happen 4= barely possible 1 = strong elements of fantasy | ||||||||
In most cases, where the effect is not ongoing, I am not factoring in unlikely disaster types. | ||||||||
Read | Readability = is it a fun book to read. | |||||||
7 = classic 4= somewhat enjoyable 1= Awful | ||||||||
Note that you will enjoy a "4" if it is your type of book, but probably hate it if not. |
No comments:
Post a Comment